Shonda Rhimes and Audra McDonald Among Bill O’Reilly Critics Over Slavery Comments

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Fox News host Bill O’Reilly has come under fire after appearing to defend the living conditions of the slaves who built the White House.

O’Reilly’s remarks came one day after First Lady Michelle Obama’s widely praised speech at the Democratic National Convention, in which she celebrated the progress of American civil rights by noting that she woke up “every morning in a house that was built by slaves.”

Seeking to “fact check” that claim, O’Reilly said that the slaves who built the White House “were well-fed and had decent lodgings.”

On Twitter, O’Reilly was immediately slammed for espousing an ante bellum worldview that appeared to defend the institution of slavery. Liam Hogan, a historian, wrote that O’Reilly’s remark was reminiscent of “how chattel slavery was defended by slave owners and pro-slavery interests.”

Scandal showrunner Shonda Rhimes and Broadway superstar Audra McDonald were among those who slammed the Fox News host over his words:


Meanwhile, some Democrats saw in O’Reilly’s remark an effort to interfere with the accolades for Obama’s speech and instead drag it into a debate about race and slavery.

“Her speech was great. So instead of letting that exist they’re stirring base to make it about Michelle talking about slavery,” one Democratic strategist told CNNMoney. “It’s a very ugly tactic.”

Early Wednesday afternoon, O’Reilly tweeted that his words were being distorted.

“Far left loons distort tip about @FLOTUS statement that slaves built White House,” he wrote. “She’s correct & I provided facts. More on The Factor.”

O’Reilly addressed his critics at the top of his program Wednesday, calling them “smear merchants” (a favorite phrase of the host) and accusing them of mischaracterizing his comments as having defended slavery.

He then went further, suggesting that Fox News is under siege, that his “far left” critics “want me dead,” and that Fox talent must band together to protect themselves from the forces being marshaled against the network and call them out by name.

O’Reilly became most agitated during the discussion that followed his “Talking Points” with Geraldo Rivera and Eric Bolling. “We’re going to have to call out the people who are actively trying to destroy this network by using lies, and deception, and propaganda,” he said. “That’s how bad it’s become.”

The part of FLOTUS’s speech in question reads, “I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves. And I watch my daughters, two beautiful, intelligent, Black young women playing with their dogs on the White House lawn.”

O’Reilly’s critique of the beautiful words were unsurprisingly ignorant. “Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the govermnent, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802,” he said.

Scandal showrunner Shonda Rhimes and Broadway superstar Audra McDonald gave the conservative host some much needed criticism of his own:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Tom Haven

    You people @ Fox pinned your hopes & futures on Trump and the right wing reactionary movement. Progressives always overcome such limited visions of America. Your arrogance and your failure to report FAIRLY the ‘News’, (not your right wing propaganda) will lead to your downfall.

  • Taryn Viv

    Fans of “Fox” and fans of facts and relevance will never mix. Having said that, O’Reilly’s comments were at best clearly irrelevant to Michelle Obama’s point on the PROGRESS this country has made. So WTF made him think he should say that at all? Now he says “far left” critics “want him dead?” I highly doubt that too. Bill is so blatantly out of touch that there’s little fear his anti-progressive and oft-times ignorant views will influence anybody with a functional brain who isn’t afraid to actually reason with it. Not that there aren’t some insidious and charismatic forces out there that we might need to worry a bit more about countering…but in my opinion, Bill is just not one of them.